The student | - communicates with some considerable clarity and considerable justification of reasoning |
- uses mathematical language, symbols, visuals, and conventions correctly |
If everyone followed these tips, the world would be a better place. Unfortunately, many people, including many mathematicians (and in particular, many senior textbook authors), do not. However, when you see a poorly explained solution or an exceptionally badly written text, you should not think to yourself, "Ah, this means I can be just as obfuscatory and obscure as this author is in my solutions." Rather, think to yourself, "I hate reading this, and I would never want to inflict this experience on anyone." Strive to do better.
There is another reason you shouldn't skip steps, even "obvious" ones:
the marker might not believe you. The logical extreme of skipping steps
is to simply write down, "Proof: Obvious. QED." as an answer to every
homework question, and no one is going to give you marks for that. When
in doubt, show your work, even if you think it's obvious, trivial, boring,
etc.
Many students get in the habit of trying to compress their work into mathematical symbolic shorthand as much as possible, because they think that this somehow makes it more "mathematical." It doesn't; it just makes it impossible to read. There is nothing wrong with expressing an argument in plain old English; far from it, this often makes it clearer and easier to understand.
Furthermore, don't "invent" new mathematical notation. If a variable is introduced in the question, use the same variable. Use standard variables for physics problems. It's all very well to use """ when you mean "p", but no one (including you, six months later) will know what you're talking about (and the other mathmaticians will laugh at you).
Finally, remember that math is a language. Math sentences have subjects and predicates, just like spoken language. In fact, you should be able to read your solution out loud and have it make sense in English/French/Mandarin. Don't leave mathematical expressions, such as (x + 1) lying around unattached or unexplained. (See What about the cat? in the Marking Key section.)
For example, a sketch of a solution might look like this:
Problem:
ABCDEFG
Solution:
SketchTherefore, the answer to ABCDEFG is ...Givens
----------
----------
In order to solve ABCDEFG, I'm going to have to solve problem XYZ:
Solution:Subbing this into the equation...-----
-----
-----
Therefore the answer to XYZ is ...
-------
------
-------
To continue solving ABCDEFG, I have to solve problem LMNOP:
Solution:Now we can finish the main solution....-----
-----
Oops, to find LMNOP, I need to solve QRST:
Solution:Continuing on with problem LMNOP:-----
-----
-----
Therefore, the answer to QRST is ...
---------
---------
Oops, now I need to solve yet another pesky problem UVW...
Solution:Are we there yet?-----
-----
-----
Therefore, the answer to UVW is ...
----------
----------
I'm glad that's done.
Therefore, the answer to LMNOP is...
---------
--------
--------